969.Coffee ElbaV PID vs La Pavoni Cellini Classic
Technical comparison · Heat exchanger
Cellini Classic is ahead on water tank capacity; beyond that the two differ in boiler material, which is a design choice rather than a ranking. On the category's technical index, ElbaV PID ranks #12 of 27, Cellini Classic #24.
| Parameter |
ElbaV PID
969.Coffee
F4 · Semi-professional
|
Cellini Classic
La Pavoni
F3 · Advanced
|
|---|---|---|
| Identity | ||
| Use tier | F4 — Semi-professional | F3 — Advanced |
| Price | ||
| Price (€) | ~1000–2200 € | 1559 € |
| Price updated on | 09/2026 | — |
| Universal specs | ||
| Dimensions (W×D×H) (cm) | 23.5 × 43 × 40 cm | 29.5 × 43 × 37 cm |
| Weight (kg) | 23.5 kg | 23 kg |
| Power (W) | — | 1400 W |
| Category specs | ||
| Boiler architecture | Heat exchanger (HX) | Heat exchanger (HX) |
| Portafilter diameter (mm) | — | 58 mm mm |
| PID control | Yes | — |
| Max pump pressure (bar) | — | 15 bar |
| Pump type | — | Vibration |
| Group head type | — | E61 |
| Boiler material | Stainless steel | Copper |
| Water tank capacity (l) | 2.5 l | 2.9 l |
| Steam wand | — | Manual steam wand |
| Plumbable | — | No |
| Pressure gauge | Yes | Yes |
The differences that matter
- Water tank capacity: ElbaV PID 2.5 l vs Cellini Classic 2.9 l
- Boiler material: ElbaV PID Stainless steel · Cellini Classic Copper
Which one to choose
Questo confronto rimanda alle due schede, dove trovi i dati completi e i link ufficiali.