969.Coffee ElbaV EVO vs Quick Mill Aquila
Technical comparison · Heat exchanger
Aquila is the only one of the two showing a measurable advantage, starting with water tank capacity; on the other available specs the data does not separate them. On the category's technical index, Aquila ranks #5 of 29, ElbaV EVO #22.
| Parameter |
ElbaV EVO
969.Coffee
F2 · Intermediate
|
Aquila
Quick Mill
F2 · Intermediate
|
|---|---|---|
| Identity | ||
| Use tier | F2 — Intermediate | F2 — Intermediate |
| Price | ||
| Price (€) | ~1000–2200 € | — |
| Price updated on | 09/2026 | — |
| Universal specs | ||
| Dimensions (W×D×H) (cm) | 23.5 × 43 × 40 cm | 30.8 × 48.2 × 36.3 cm |
| Weight (kg) | 23.5 kg | 28.5 kg |
| Category specs | ||
| Boiler architecture | Heat exchanger (HX) | Heat exchanger (HX) |
| PID control | — | Yes |
| Pump type | — | Rotary |
| Pre-infusion | — | Programmable |
| Boiler material | Stainless steel | Stainless steel |
| Water tank capacity (l) | 2.5 l | 3 l |
| Plumbable | — | Yes |
| Pressure gauge | Yes | Yes |
| Ecosystem | ||
| Software notes | — | The OLED display shows temperature, shot timer, water shortage sensor, standby and eco modes. No app or connectivity is listed. |
The differences that matter
- Water tank capacity: ElbaV EVO 2.5 l vs Aquila 3 l
Which one to choose
Questo confronto rimanda alle due schede, dove trovi i dati completi e i link ufficiali.