Acaia Umbra vs Timemore Basic 2.0
Technical comparison · Scales
Umbra and Basic 2.0 are not direct competitors: different use classes. Basic 2.0 is the entry-level choice; Umbra offers more capability in a higher class. Judge them by budget, not head-to-head.
| Parameter |
Umbra
Acaia
F1 · Entry
|
Basic 2.0
Timemore
F3 · Advanced
|
|---|---|---|
| Awards | — | |
| Identity | ||
| Use tier | F1 — Entry | F3 — Advanced |
| Price | ||
| Price (€) | ~90–200 € | ~40–90 € |
| Universal specs | ||
| Dimensions (W×D×H) (cm) | 10.5 × 10.5 × 1.5 cm | — |
| Weight (kg) | 0.3 kg | — |
| Category specs | ||
| Readability (g) | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Max capacity (g) | 1000 g | 2000 g |
| Built-in timer | No | Yes |
| Flow rate measurement | No | Yes |
| Water resistant | Yes | Yes |
CoffeeSpecs Awards
Umbra
No awards in this tier.
Basic 2.0
Best value Advanced
Best balance of technical score and price among the 5 sheets in the Scales category (advanced tier): technical score 60/100. The price used is the sheet's estimated range.
How we assign awards →Lowest price range Advanced
The lowest estimated price range among the sheets in the Scales category (advanced tier): 40–90 €. It is an editorial estimate, not a selling price.
How we assign awards →The differences that matter
- Built-in timer: Basic 2.0 yes, Umbra no
- Flow rate measurement: Basic 2.0 yes, Umbra no
Which one to choose
Questo confronto rimanda alle due schede, dove trovi i dati completi e i link ufficiali.