Baratza Sette 270 vs Quamar M80T
Technical comparison · Espresso grinders
M80T is ahead on burr diameter; beyond that the two differ in burr type and supported brew methods, which is a design choice rather than a ranking. On the category's technical index, M80T ranks #5 of 14, Sette 270 #10.
| Parameter |
Sette 270
Baratza
F3 · Advanced
|
M80T
Quamar
F4 · Semi-professional
|
|---|---|---|
| Identity | ||
| Use tier | F3 — Advanced | F4 — Semi-professional |
| Price | ||
| Price (€) | 349.95 € | ~450–1000 € |
| Price updated on | 09/2026 | 09/2026 |
| Universal specs | ||
| Dimensions (W×D×H) (cm) | 13 × 25 × 41 cm | 17.5 × 29 × 56 cm |
| Weight (kg) | 3.2 kg | 11 kg |
| Power (W) | 240 W | 480 W |
| Voltage (V) | 220 V | 220 V |
| Category specs | ||
| Burr type | Conical | Flat |
| Burr diameter (mm) | 40 mm | 63 mm |
| Single dose | No | No |
| Supported brew methods | Espresso, Pour over | Espresso, Moka pot, Drip filter, Pour over |
| Adjustment type | Stepped | Stepped |
| Number of steps | 31 | — |
| Drive | Electric | Electric |
| Hopper capacity (g) | 300 g | 1200 g |
The differences that matter
- Burr diameter: Sette 270 40 mm vs M80T 63 mm — M80T wins (+57%)
- Burr type: Sette 270 Conical · M80T Flat
- Supported brew methods: Sette 270 Espresso, Pour over · M80T Espresso, Moka pot, Drip filter, Pour over
Which one to choose
Questo confronto rimanda alle due schede, dove trovi i dati completi e i link ufficiali.