ECM S-Automatik 64 vs Quamar Q50E
Technical comparison · Espresso grinders
S-Automatik 64 is ahead on burr diameter; beyond that the two differ in supported brew methods and adjustment type, which is a design choice rather than a ranking. On the category's technical index, S-Automatik 64 ranks #2 of 14, Q50E #6.
| Parameter |
S-Automatik 64
ECM
F3 · Advanced
|
Q50E
Quamar
F4 · Semi-professional
|
|---|---|---|
| Identity | ||
| Use tier | F3 — Advanced | F4 — Semi-professional |
| Price | ||
| Price (€) | ~450–1000 € | ~450–1000 € |
| Price updated on | 09/2026 | 09/2026 |
| Universal specs | ||
| Dimensions (W×D×H) (cm) | 15 × 24.5 × 41.5 cm | 17.5 × 26 × 52 cm |
| Weight (kg) | 6.9 kg | 7 kg |
| Power (W) | 450 W | 330 W |
| Voltage (V) | 230 V | 220 V |
| Category specs | ||
| Burr type | — | Flat |
| Burr diameter (mm) | 64 mm | 54 mm |
| Single dose | No | No |
| Supported brew methods | Espresso | Espresso, Moka pot, Drip filter, Pour over |
| Adjustment type | Stepless | Stepped |
| Burr material | Stainless steel | — |
| Drive | Electric | Electric |
| Motor speed (rpm) | 1400 rpm | — |
| Hopper capacity (g) | 500 g | 1200 g |
The differences that matter
- Burr diameter: S-Automatik 64 64 mm vs Q50E 54 mm — S-Automatik 64 wins (+19%)
- Supported brew methods: S-Automatik 64 Espresso · Q50E Espresso, Moka pot, Drip filter, Pour over
- Adjustment type: S-Automatik 64 Stepless · Q50E Stepped
Which one to choose
Questo confronto rimanda alle due schede, dove trovi i dati completi e i link ufficiali.