Rocket Espresso Appartamento vs Sanremo Cube

Technical comparison · Heat exchanger

In brief

The comparison between Rocket Espresso Appartamento (2016) and Sanremo Cube (2021) examines two heat exchanger machines designed for the semi-professional segment. The evaluation targets advanced home users deciding between a classic E61 architecture and a newer platform with direct water connection capabilities.

Parameter
Rocket Espresso Appartamento Appartamento Rocket Espresso F4 · Semi-professional
Sanremo Cube Cube Sanremo F4 · Semi-professional
Identity
Launch year 2016 2021
Use tier F4 — Semi-professional F4 — Semi-professional
Price
Price (€) ~1000–2200 € ~2200–5000 €
Price updated on 09/2026 09/2026
Universal specs
Dimensions (W×D×H) (cm) 27.4 × 43.95 × 36 cm 33.6 × 32.3 × 37.1 cm
Weight (kg) 20 kg 27.7 kg
Power (W) 1350 W 1500 W
Voltage (V) 220 V 230 V
Category specs
Boiler architecture Heat exchanger (HX) Heat exchanger (HX)
Portafilter diameter (mm) 58 mm mm —
PID control No —
Pump type — Vibration
Pre-infusion — Passive spring
Group head type E61 Thermosiphon
Boiler material — Stainless steel
Water tank capacity (l) 2.5 l 1.8 l
Plumbable No Yes

The differences that matter

The dimensional difference is substantial: Appartamento is narrower and deeper (27.4 x 43.95 cm), while Cube is wider and shallower (33.6 x 32.3 cm). Cube allows direct water line connection and uses a stainless steel boiler with a thermosiphon group, adding 7.7 kg in weight (27.7 kg total). Appartamento utilizes the traditional E61 group, offers a larger reservoir (2.5 l versus 1.8 l), and does not support plumb-in operation.

Which one to choose

Choose Appartamento if…

Rocket Espresso Appartamento suits users with limited width space (27.4 cm) who operate exclusively with an internal reservoir (2.5 l). Its E61 architecture without PID requires learning the cooling flush, sitting in an estimated price range of 1000–2200€.

See the Appartamento sheet →

Choose Cube if…

Sanremo Cube addresses the needs of users requiring a direct water line connection and operating in spaces with reduced depth (32.3 cm). The required investment in the estimated 2200–5000€ range provides a thermosiphon group with a stainless steel boiler and higher power draw (1500 W versus 1350 W).

See the Cube sheet →

Where to buy

Paid link: the price for you does not change.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Questo confronto rimanda alle due schede, dove trovi i dati completi e i link ufficiali.