Baratza Sette 270 vs Fiorenzato F64 EVO
Technical comparison · Espresso grinders
F64 EVO is ahead on burr diameter; beyond that the two differ in burr type and adjustment type, which is a design choice rather than a ranking. On the category's technical index, F64 EVO ranks #5 of 20, Sette 270 #16.
| Parameter |
Sette 270
Baratza
F3 · Advanced
|
F64 EVO
Fiorenzato
F4 · Semi-professional
|
|---|---|---|
| Identity | ||
| Use tier | F3 — Advanced | F4 — Semi-professional |
| Price | ||
| Price (€) | 349.95 € | ~450–1000 € |
| Price updated on | 09/2026 | 09/2026 |
| Universal specs | ||
| Dimensions (W×D×H) (cm) | 13 × 25 × 41 cm | — |
| Weight (kg) | 3.2 kg | 13 kg |
| Power (W) | 240 W | 450 W |
| Voltage (V) | 220 V | — |
| Category specs | ||
| Burr type | Conical | Flat |
| Burr diameter (mm) | 40 mm | 64 mm |
| Single dose | No | No |
| Supported brew methods | Espresso, Pour over | — |
| Adjustment type | Stepped | Micrometric |
| Number of steps | 31 | — |
| Burr material | — | Steel |
| Drive | Electric | Electric |
| Hopper capacity (g) | 300 g | 1500 g |
The differences that matter
- Burr diameter: Sette 270 40 mm vs F64 EVO 64 mm — F64 EVO wins (+60%)
- Burr type: Sette 270 Conical · F64 EVO Flat
- Adjustment type: Sette 270 Stepped · F64 EVO Micrometric
Which one to choose
Questo confronto rimanda alle due schede, dove trovi i dati completi e i link ufficiali.