Profitec Jump vs Sanremo Cube
Technical comparison · Heat exchanger
Jump is ahead on water tank capacity; beyond that the two differ in group head type, which is a design choice rather than a ranking. On the category's technical index, Jump ranks #3 of 16, Cube #13.
| Parameter |
Jump
Profitec
F4 · Semi-professional
|
Cube
Sanremo
F4 · Semi-professional
|
|---|---|---|
| Identity | ||
| Launch year | 2022 | 2021 |
| Use tier | F4 — Semi-professional | F4 — Semi-professional |
| Price | ||
| Price (€) | ~1000–2200 € | ~2200–5000 € |
| Price updated on | 09/2026 | 09/2026 |
| Universal specs | ||
| Dimensions (W×D×H) (cm) | 22.8 × 44.8 × 37.2 cm | 33.6 × 32.3 × 37.1 cm |
| Weight (kg) | 21.5 kg | 27.7 kg |
| Power (W) | 1400 W | 1500 W |
| Voltage (V) | — | 230 V |
| Category specs | ||
| Boiler architecture | Heat exchanger (HX) | Heat exchanger (HX) |
| Portafilter diameter (mm) | 58 mm mm | — |
| PID control | Yes | — |
| Pump type | Vibration | Vibration |
| Pre-infusion | — | Passive spring |
| Group head type | Proprietary | Thermosiphon |
| Boiler material | Stainless steel | Stainless steel |
| Water tank capacity (l) | 2.8 l | 1.8 l |
| Plumbable | — | Yes |
| Pressure gauge | Yes | — |
The differences that matter
- Water tank capacity: Jump 2.8 l vs Cube 1.8 l — Jump wins (+56%)
- Group head type: Jump Proprietary · Cube Thermosiphon
Which one to choose
Questo confronto rimanda alle due schede, dove trovi i dati completi e i link ufficiali.