969.Coffee ElbaV PID vs La Pavoni Cellini Evo PID

Technical comparison · Heat exchanger

In brief

ElbaV PID is ahead on water tank capacity; beyond that the two differ in boiler material, which is a design choice rather than a ranking. On the category's technical index, ElbaV PID ranks #11 of 25, Cellini Evo PID #15.

Text composed automatically from the data of the two product pages, not reviewed by a person. The criteria are stated and the calculation is reproducible. Data as of
Parameter
969.Coffee ElbaV PID ElbaV PID 969.Coffee F4 · Semi-professional
La Pavoni Cellini Evo PID Cellini Evo PID La Pavoni F4 · Semi-professional
Identity
Use tier F4 — Semi-professional F4 — Semi-professional
Price
Price (€) ~1000–2200 € ~1000–2200 €
Price updated on 09/2026 09/2026
Universal specs
Dimensions (W×D×H) (cm) 23.5 × 43 × 40 cm 29.5 × 43 × 37 cm
Weight (kg) 23.5 kg 24.7 kg
Power (W) — 1520 W
Voltage (V) — 220 V
Category specs
Boiler architecture Heat exchanger (HX) Heat exchanger (HX)
Portafilter diameter (mm) — 58 mm mm
PID control Yes Yes
Pump type — Rotary
Group head type — E61
Boiler material Stainless steel Copper
Water tank capacity (l) 2.5 l 1.7 l
Steam wand — Manual steam wand
Plumbable — Yes
Pressure gauge Yes Yes

The differences that matter

  • Water tank capacity: ElbaV PID 2.5 l vs Cellini Evo PID 1.7 l — ElbaV PID wins (+47%)
  • Boiler material: ElbaV PID Stainless steel · Cellini Evo PID Copper

Which one to choose

Choose ElbaV PID if…

you value water tank capacity.

See the ElbaV PID sheet →

Questo confronto rimanda alle due schede, dove trovi i dati completi e i link ufficiali.

Other comparisons for this category