ECM Mechanika MAX II vs Sanremo Cube R
Technical comparison · Heat exchanger
Mechanika MAX II is ahead on water tank capacity; beyond that the two differ in pre-infusion, which is a design choice rather than a ranking. On the category's technical index, Mechanika MAX II ranks #5 of 25, Cube R #16.
| Parameter |
Mechanika MAX II
ECM
F4 · Semi-professional
|
Cube R
Sanremo
F4 · Semi-professional
|
|---|---|---|
| Identity | ||
| Launch year | — | 2021 |
| Use tier | F4 — Semi-professional | F4 — Semi-professional |
| Price | ||
| Price (€) | ~2200–5000 € | ~2200–5000 € |
| Price updated on | 09/2026 | 09/2026 |
| Universal specs | ||
| Dimensions (W×D×H) (cm) | 27.5 × 44.5 × 40.5 cm | 33.6 × 32.3 × 37.1 cm |
| Weight (kg) | 23.5 kg | 27.7 kg |
| Power (W) | 2000 W | 1500 W |
| Voltage (V) | — | 230 V |
| Category specs | ||
| Boiler architecture | Heat exchanger (HX) | Heat exchanger (HX) |
| PID control | Yes | Yes |
| Pump type | — | Rotary |
| Pre-infusion | Programmable | Passive spring |
| Group head type | — | Thermosiphon |
| Boiler material | — | Stainless steel |
| Water tank capacity (l) | 3 l | 1.8 l |
| Plumbable | Yes | Yes |
| Pressure gauge | Yes | — |
The differences that matter
- Water tank capacity: Mechanika MAX II 3 l vs Cube R 1.8 l — Mechanika MAX II wins (+67%)
- Pre-infusion: Mechanika MAX II Programmable · Cube R Passive spring
Which one to choose
Questo confronto rimanda alle due schede, dove trovi i dati completi e i link ufficiali.