ECM Puristika vs Gaggia Classic UP
Technical comparison · Single boiler
Classic UP is ahead on water tank capacity; beyond that the two differ in boiler material, which is a design choice rather than a ranking. On the category's technical index, Classic UP ranks #7 of 16, Puristika #10.
| Parameter |
Puristika
ECM
F3 · Advanced
|
Classic UP
Gaggia
F2 · Intermediate
|
|---|---|---|
| Identity | ||
| Use tier | F3 — Advanced | F2 — Intermediate |
| Price | ||
| Price (€) | ~1000–2200 € | — |
| Price updated on | 09/2026 | — |
| Universal specs | ||
| Dimensions (W×D×H) (cm) | 19.5 × 34.8 × 31.5 cm | 20 × 27 × 36 cm |
| Weight (kg) | 13.4 kg | 8.1 kg |
| Power (W) | 1000 W | 1200 W |
| Voltage (V) | 230 V | 230 V |
| Category specs | ||
| Boiler architecture | Single boiler | — |
| Portafilter diameter (mm) | — | 58 mm mm |
| PID control | Yes | Yes |
| Brew pressure (bar) | — | 9 bar |
| Max pump pressure (bar) | — | 15 bar |
| Pump type | Vibration | — |
| 3-way solenoid valve | — | Yes |
| Group head type | Proprietary | — |
| Boiler material | Stainless steel | Brass |
| Water tank capacity (l) | 2 l | 2.1 l |
| Pressure gauge | Yes | Yes |
The differences that matter
- Water tank capacity: Puristika 2 l vs Classic UP 2.1 l
- Boiler material: Puristika Stainless steel · Classic UP Brass
Which one to choose
Questo confronto rimanda alle due schede, dove trovi i dati completi e i link ufficiali.