La Pavoni Cellini Evo PID vs Sanremo Cube R
Technical comparison · Heat exchanger
Cube R is ahead on water tank capacity; beyond that the two differ in group head type and boiler material, which is a design choice rather than a ranking. On the category's technical index, Cellini Evo PID ranks #15 of 25, Cube R #16.
| Parameter |
Cellini Evo PID
La Pavoni
F4 · Semi-professional
|
Cube R
Sanremo
F4 · Semi-professional
|
|---|---|---|
| Identity | ||
| Launch year | — | 2021 |
| Use tier | F4 — Semi-professional | F4 — Semi-professional |
| Price | ||
| Price (€) | ~1000–2200 € | ~2200–5000 € |
| Price updated on | 09/2026 | 09/2026 |
| Universal specs | ||
| Dimensions (W×D×H) (cm) | 29.5 × 43 × 37 cm | 33.6 × 32.3 × 37.1 cm |
| Weight (kg) | 24.7 kg | 27.7 kg |
| Power (W) | 1520 W | 1500 W |
| Voltage (V) | 220 V | 230 V |
| Category specs | ||
| Boiler architecture | Heat exchanger (HX) | Heat exchanger (HX) |
| Portafilter diameter (mm) | 58 mm mm | 58 mm mm |
| PID control | Yes | Yes |
| Pump type | Rotary | Rotary |
| Pre-infusion | — | Passive spring |
| Group head type | E61 | Thermosiphon |
| Boiler material | Copper | Stainless steel |
| Water tank capacity (l) | 1.7 l | 1.8 l |
| Steam wand | Manual steam wand | — |
| Plumbable | Yes | Yes |
| Pressure gauge | Yes | — |
The differences that matter
- Water tank capacity: Cellini Evo PID 1.7 l vs Cube R 1.8 l — Cube R wins (+6%)
- Group head type: Cellini Evo PID E61 · Cube R Thermosiphon
- Boiler material: Cellini Evo PID Copper · Cube R Stainless steel
Which one to choose
Questo confronto rimanda alle due schede, dove trovi i dati completi e i link ufficiali.