Quick Mill Aquila vs Stone Espresso Stone
Technical comparison · Heat exchanger
Aquila is the only one of the two showing a measurable advantage, starting with water tank capacity; on the other available specs the data does not separate them. On the category's technical index, Aquila ranks #5 of 29, Stone #27.
| Parameter |
Aquila
Quick Mill
F2 · Intermediate
|
Stone
Stone Espresso
F3 · Advanced
|
|---|---|---|
| Identity | ||
| Use tier | F2 — Intermediate | F3 — Advanced |
| Price | ||
| Price (€) | — | ~1000–2200 € |
| Price updated on | — | 09/2026 |
| Universal specs | ||
| Dimensions (W×D×H) (cm) | 30.8 × 48.2 × 36.3 cm | 22.5 × 44 × 35.5 cm |
| Weight (kg) | 28.5 kg | 20.5 kg |
| Power (W) | — | 1000 W |
| Voltage (V) | — | 220 V |
| Category specs | ||
| Boiler architecture | Heat exchanger (HX) | Heat exchanger (HX) |
| PID control | Yes | Yes |
| Pump type | Rotary | — |
| Pre-infusion | Programmable | — |
| Boiler material | Stainless steel | — |
| Water tank capacity (l) | 3 l | 1.2 l |
| Heat-up time (s) | — | 600 s |
| Plumbable | Yes | — |
| Pressure gauge | Yes | — |
| Ecosystem | ||
| Software notes | The OLED display shows temperature, shot timer, water shortage sensor, standby and eco modes. No app or connectivity is listed. | — |
The differences that matter
- Water tank capacity: Aquila 3 l vs Stone 1.2 l
Which one to choose
Questo confronto rimanda alle due schede, dove trovi i dati completi e i link ufficiali.