ECM Puristika vs Profitec GO 2.0
Technical comparison · Single boiler
GO 2.0 is ahead on water tank capacity; beyond that the two differ in group head type and boiler material, which is a design choice rather than a ranking. On the category's technical index, GO 2.0 ranks #2 of 14, Puristika #9.
| Parameter |
Puristika
ECM
F3 · Advanced
|
GO 2.0
Profitec
F2 · Intermediate
|
|---|---|---|
| Identity | ||
| Use tier | F3 — Advanced | F2 — Intermediate |
| Price | ||
| Price (€) | ~1000–2200 € | ~450–1000 € |
| Price updated on | 09/2026 | — |
| Universal specs | ||
| Dimensions (W×D×H) (cm) | 19.5 × 34.8 × 31.5 cm | — |
| Weight (kg) | 13.4 kg | 12 kg |
| Power (W) | 1000 W | 1300 W |
| Voltage (V) | 230 V | 230 V |
| Category specs | ||
| Boiler architecture | Single boiler | Single boiler |
| PID control | Yes | Yes |
| Pump type | Vibration | Vibration |
| Group head type | Proprietary | Ring brew group |
| Boiler material | Stainless steel | Brass |
| Water tank capacity (l) | 2 l | 2.8 l |
| Pressure gauge | Yes | Yes |
The differences that matter
- Water tank capacity: Puristika 2 l vs GO 2.0 2.8 l
- Group head type: Puristika Proprietary · GO 2.0 Ring brew group
- Boiler material: Puristika Stainless steel · GO 2.0 Brass
Which one to choose
Questo confronto rimanda alle due schede, dove trovi i dati completi e i link ufficiali.